create a file
.inputrc
set bell-style visible
and can use xset b 0
as well
------------------
.emacs file
and how to shut off in emacs?
this will make it visible
(setq visible-bell 1)
;; Now some people find the flashing annoying. To turn the alarm totally off, you can use this:
(setq ring-bell-function 'ignore)
Saturday, January 28, 2012
Thursday, November 24, 2011
trouble with texlive-base in sid upgrade
apt-get upgrade or dist-upgrade
I had persistent problems
errors were encountered while processing:
texlive-base
texlive-latex-base
feynmf
texlive-latex-recommended
texlive-fonts-recommended
pdfjam
texlive
texlive-generic-recommended
texlive-luatex
texlive-metapost
texlive-pictures
texmacs
ie the following
Reading database ... 642501 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace texlive-latex-base 2009-14 (using .../texlive-latex-base_2009-15_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement texlive-latex-base ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Setting up texlive-base (2009-15) ...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVE...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Done.
Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done.
Building format(s) --all --cnffile /etc/texmf/fmt.d/10texlive-base.cnf.
This may take some time...
fmtutil-sys failed. Output has been stored in
/tmp/fmtutil.QRFBRZLF
Please include this file if you report a bug.
dpkg: error processing texlive-base (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
configured to not write apport reports
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of texlive-latex-base:
texlive-latex-base depends on texlive-base (>= 2009-1); however:
Package texlive-base is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing texlive-latex-base (--configure):
dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
configured to not write apport reports
dpkg: dependency problems prevent confi
---------------
so what i did was read the bug report
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648278
i tried this so let us see what happens with the next attempt to upgrade
Rashi:/home/mlaks# mktexlsr /usr/share/texmf
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
mktexlsr: Done.
Rashi:/home/mlaks#
This did not help:
then see the remark there about installing all the texlive-base dependencies
at the same time
-----------------
Holger Levsen wrote:
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per
> definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for a
> release, thus the severity.
Thank you, I found the reason - both bug reports seem to point to the
same problem. It does not show up when all dependencies of texlive-base
are installed in the same aptitude or dpkg run, only when they are
configured first and texlive-base is unpacked afterwards.
And of course it is in my new libpaper'ing code...
A fix is in svn, I'll upload soon.
Regards, Frank
-----------
that fixes it
so I did this
apt-get remove --purge texlive-base texlive-common texlive-binaries texlive-doc-base tex-common luatex
(copied down all the stuff being purged and then did)
apt-get install texlive-base texlive-common texlive-binaries texlive-doc-base tex-common luatex
and then we were ok
next step is to reinstall whole batch of files that were removed
:)
I had persistent problems
errors were encountered while processing:
texlive-base
texlive-latex-base
feynmf
texlive-latex-recommended
texlive-fonts-recommended
pdfjam
texlive
texlive-generic-recommended
texlive-luatex
texlive-metapost
texlive-pictures
texmacs
ie the following
Reading database ... 642501 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace texlive-latex-base 2009-14 (using .../texlive-latex-base_2009-15_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement texlive-latex-base ...
Processing triggers for man-db ...
Setting up texlive-base (2009-15) ...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXLIVE...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R...
mktexlsr: Done.
Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... done.
Building format(s) --all --cnffile /etc/texmf/fmt.d/10texlive-base.cnf.
This may take some time...
fmtutil-sys failed. Output has been stored in
/tmp/fmtutil.QRFBRZLF
Please include this file if you report a bug.
dpkg: error processing texlive-base (--configure):
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
configured to not write apport reports
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of texlive-latex-base:
texlive-latex-base depends on texlive-base (>= 2009-1); however:
Package texlive-base is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing texlive-latex-base (--configure):
dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
configured to not write apport reports
dpkg: dependency problems prevent confi
---------------
so what i did was read the bug report
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648278
i tried this so let us see what happens with the next attempt to upgrade
Rashi:/home/mlaks# mktexlsr /usr/share/texmf
mktexlsr: Updating /var/lib/texmf/ls-R-TEXMFMAIN...
mktexlsr: Done.
Rashi:/home/mlaks#
This did not help:
then see the remark there about installing all the texlive-base dependencies
at the same time
-----------------
Holger Levsen
> during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. As per
> definition of the release team this makes the package too buggy for a
> release, thus the severity.
Thank you, I found the reason - both bug reports seem to point to the
same problem. It does not show up when all dependencies of texlive-base
are installed in the same aptitude or dpkg run, only when they are
configured first and texlive-base is unpacked afterwards.
And of course it is in my new libpaper'ing code...
A fix is in svn, I'll upload soon.
Regards, Frank
-----------
that fixes it
so I did this
apt-get remove --purge texlive-base texlive-common texlive-binaries texlive-doc-base tex-common luatex
(copied down all the stuff being purged and then did)
apt-get install texlive-base texlive-common texlive-binaries texlive-doc-base tex-common luatex
and then we were ok
next step is to reinstall whole batch of files that were removed
:)
Sunday, September 25, 2011
How to get rid of all the rc entries in dpkg -l?
i just did the following and it seems to work
dpkg -l|grep -e ^rc|perl -pe 's/rc\s+(\S+)\s+\d.*/$1/'|xargs apt-get -y remove --purge
use at your own risk!
dpkg -l|grep -e ^rc|perl -pe 's/rc\s+(\S+)\s+\d.*/$1/'|xargs apt-get -y remove --purge
use at your own risk!
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
how to persist a connection?
ssh
or
vpnc?
ssh
then open a screen session
screen
create new window
^-a c
then split window
^-a S ## capitol S
move to other window
^-a tab
grab the window to the frame
^-a "shift+'" and select a window to place there
then make a busy application
wait -n 10 date
will create a very busy application with connection
How to do screen within screen???
^-a-a
ie
^-a then a regular a
done!!!
or
vpnc?
ssh
then open a screen session
screen
create new window
^-a c
then split window
^-a S ## capitol S
move to other window
^-a tab
grab the window to the frame
^-a "shift+'" and select a window to place there
then make a busy application
wait -n 10 date
will create a very busy application with connection
How to do screen within screen???
^-a-a
ie
^-a then a regular a
done!!!
Sunday, August 7, 2011
windws focus follows mouse registry hacks
inportant information i keep losing.
http://sinewalker.wordpress.com/2010/03/10/ms-windows-focus-follows-mouse-registry-hacks/
1. Run regedit (Win+R, regedit, OK)
2. Open up the key HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\Mouse
3. Change the value of the REG_DWORD ActiveWindowTracking to 0×0000001 (1)
4. Open up the key HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\Desktop
5. Add 1 to the MSB (most significant byte) of the REG_BINARY UserPreferencesMask. That is, if the current value is 00 3e 03 80 12 00 00 00, then change it to 01 3e 03 80 12 00 00 00. If you used the GUI as above, the MSB will be 41 (which brings the focused window to the front as well), so change it back to 01.
6. To make the focus a little slower, so that pop-up windows are useable, you also want to change the focus timing. Change the REG_DWORD ActiveWindTrkTimeout (also in HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\Desktop) to the number of milliseconds to wait before focus shifts to the window under the mouse. I like a value of 0×00000080 (128ms). You might like 200ms (c8), or some faster or slower value.
So, in summary, the Registry keys are as follows for X11-like window focus:
HKEY_CURRENT_USERS\Control Panel\Mouse
REG_DWORD ActiveWindowTracking = 0x00000001 (1)
HKEY_CURRENT_USERS\Control Panel\Desktop
REG_DWORD ActiveWindTrkTimeout = 0x00000080 (128)
REG_BINARY UserPreferencesMask = 01 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
http://sinewalker.wordpress.com/2010/03/10/ms-windows-focus-follows-mouse-registry-hacks/
1. Run regedit (Win+R, regedit, OK)
2. Open up the key HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\Mouse
3. Change the value of the REG_DWORD ActiveWindowTracking to 0×0000001 (1)
4. Open up the key HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\Desktop
5. Add 1 to the MSB (most significant byte) of the REG_BINARY UserPreferencesMask. That is, if the current value is 00 3e 03 80 12 00 00 00, then change it to 01 3e 03 80 12 00 00 00. If you used the GUI as above, the MSB will be 41 (which brings the focused window to the front as well), so change it back to 01.
6. To make the focus a little slower, so that pop-up windows are useable, you also want to change the focus timing. Change the REG_DWORD ActiveWindTrkTimeout (also in HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Control Panel\Desktop) to the number of milliseconds to wait before focus shifts to the window under the mouse. I like a value of 0×00000080 (128ms). You might like 200ms (c8), or some faster or slower value.
So, in summary, the Registry keys are as follows for X11-like window focus:
HKEY_CURRENT_USERS\Control Panel\Mouse
REG_DWORD ActiveWindowTracking = 0x00000001 (1)
HKEY_CURRENT_USERS\Control Panel\Desktop
REG_DWORD ActiveWindTrkTimeout = 0x00000080 (128)
REG_BINARY UserPreferencesMask = 01 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Sunday, May 22, 2011
letting a remote machine know about urxvt-unicode terminal
REMOTE=remotesystem.domain
infocmp rxvt-unicode | ssh $REMOTE "mkdir -p .terminfo && cat >/tmp/ti && tic /tmp/ti"
works nicely if you cant install urxvt there.
see man for urxvt
infocmp rxvt-unicode | ssh $REMOTE "mkdir -p .terminfo && cat >/tmp/ti && tic /tmp/ti"
works nicely if you cant install urxvt there.
see man for urxvt
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)